[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a07yNiadLCJcA0Tyfo90YeQ0P2XF-wOEy9XAb8cDTFObw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:43:32 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:11 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number
> > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one
> > > > reason or another.
> > > >
> > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking
> > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps:
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot!
> > >
> > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all
> > > > architectures but that we definitely want there.
> > >
> > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k.
> > > Is that intentional?
> >
> > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I
> > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with
> > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in
> > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both
> > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit
> > architectures, I can add that as well.
>
> Thanks, sounds fine to me.
Just to be sure, you mean it's fine to not add it, not that we should
add it?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists