[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190110082633.6321-2-wens@csie.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:26:33 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Fix and simplify pin bank regulator handling
The new per-pin-bank regulator handling code in the sunxi pinctrl driver
has mismatched conditions for enabling and disabling the regulator: it
is enabled each time a pin is requested, but only disabled when the
pin-bank's reference count reaches zero.
Since we are doing reference counting already, there's no need to enable
the regulator each time a pin is requested. Instead we can just do it
for the first requested pin of each pin-bank. Thus we can reverse the
test and bail out early if it's not the first occurrence.
Fixes: 9a2a566adb00 ("pinctrl: sunxi: Deal with per-bank regulators")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
---
I'm getting the feeling that the current code is prone to race
conditions when pinctrl sets are actively switched during runtime, or
gpios are requested and freed from userspace.
Any ideas?
---
drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 36 ++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
index 5d9184d18c16..9ad6e9c2adab 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
@@ -699,25 +699,21 @@ static int sunxi_pmx_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned offset)
struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
unsigned short bank = offset / PINS_PER_BANK;
struct sunxi_pinctrl_regulator *s_reg = &pctl->regulators[bank];
- struct regulator *reg;
+ struct regulator *reg = s_reg->regulator;
+ char supply[16];
int ret;
- reg = s_reg->regulator;
- if (!reg) {
- char supply[16];
-
- snprintf(supply, sizeof(supply), "vcc-p%c", 'a' + bank);
- reg = regulator_get(pctl->dev, supply);
- if (IS_ERR(reg)) {
- dev_err(pctl->dev, "Couldn't get bank P%c regulator\n",
- 'A' + bank);
- return PTR_ERR(reg);
- }
-
- s_reg->regulator = reg;
- refcount_set(&s_reg->refcount, 1);
- } else {
+ if (reg) {
refcount_inc(&s_reg->refcount);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ snprintf(supply, sizeof(supply), "vcc-p%c", 'a' + bank);
+ reg = regulator_get(pctl->dev, supply);
+ if (IS_ERR(reg)) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "Couldn't get bank P%c regulator\n",
+ 'A' + bank);
+ return PTR_ERR(reg);
}
ret = regulator_enable(reg);
@@ -727,13 +723,13 @@ static int sunxi_pmx_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned offset)
goto out;
}
+ s_reg->regulator = reg;
+ refcount_set(&s_reg->refcount, 1);
+
return 0;
out:
- if (refcount_dec_and_test(&s_reg->refcount)) {
- regulator_put(s_reg->regulator);
- s_reg->regulator = NULL;
- }
+ regulator_put(s_reg->regulator);
return ret;
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists