linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: use rdmsr_safe() to workaround AWS host issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87woncol9s.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Jan 2019 11:32:47 +0100
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>, X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Jan H. Schönherr <jschoenh@...zon.de>,
        David Duncan <davdunc@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: use rdmsr_safe() to workaround AWS host issue

Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 5:00 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:09:31PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> > Hm, why is that? In theory, hypervisors can pass through or emulate the
>> > required MSRs...
>>
>> ...and when the theory becomes reality we'll remove the check.
>
> In practice that may be a long time coming. We don't have many CLOSIDs, or
> bits in a cache mask, at the h/w level. If you start trying to
> subdivide those resources to pass a subset to a guest, then you'll
> quickly find that you have no flexibility in the guest to do anything
> useful.  It would only work if you limited to two, or perhaps three
> guests.

Running a single guest on a physical CPU is a very common scenario. In
fact, sharing cores is very rare for public clouds: e.g. all worthy
instance types on AWS/Azure give you dedicated cores and I don't see why
hypervisor can't pass through resctl features.

The other thing is: how can we be sure that there's no hypervisor
exposing these feature already? Even if open-source hypervisors like
KVM/Xen don't do it it doesn't prove anything: there are numerous
proprietary hypervisors and who knows what they do.

The original issue which triggered the discussion was discovered on AWS
Xen where the host is buggy and I suggested a simple short-term
workaround, I'm no expert in rdt/qos so I'm leaving this up to the
maintainers to decide which fix deserves to go in (if any).

-- 
Vitaly