[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1547130015.10666.17.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:20:15 +0800
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: edubezval@...il.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, corbet@....net, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
krzk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] thermal: add irq-mode configuration for trip
point
Hi, Lukasz,
On 四, 2018-12-06 at 20:55 +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>
> On 12/6/18 8:18 PM, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rui,
> >
> > On 12/5/18 4:09 PM, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > >
> > > On 三, 2018-11-07 at 18:09 +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This patch adds support irq mode in trip point.
> > > > When that flag is set in DT, there is no need for polling
> > > > in thermal framework. Crossing the trip point will rise an IRQ.
> > > > The naming convention for tip point 'type' can be confussing
> > > > and 'passive' (whic is passive cooling) might be interpretted
> > > > wrongly.
> > > >
> > > > This mechanism prevents from missue and adds explicit setting
> > > > for hardware which support interrupts for pre-configured
> > > > temperature
> > > > threshold.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > > > Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
> > > > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > > > include/linux/thermal.h | 5 +++++
> > > > 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/of-
> > > > thermal.c
> > > > index 4bfdb4a..1a75946a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> > > > @@ -312,6 +312,20 @@ static int of_thermal_get_trip_type(struct
> > > > thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip,
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > +static int
> > > > +of_thermal_get_trip_irq_mode(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> > > > int
> > > > trip,
> > > > + bool *mode)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct __thermal_zone *data = tz->devdata;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (trip >= data->ntrips || trip < 0)
> > > > + return -EDOM;
> > > > +
> > > > + *mode = data->trips[trip].irq_mode;
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static int of_thermal_get_trip_temp(struct
> > > > thermal_zone_device *tz,
> > > > int trip,
> > > > int *temp)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -394,6 +408,7 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device_ops
> > > > of_thermal_ops = {
> > > > .set_mode = of_thermal_set_mode,
> > > > .get_trip_type = of_thermal_get_trip_type,
> > > > + .get_trip_irq_mode = of_thermal_get_trip_irq_mode,
> > > > .get_trip_temp = of_thermal_get_trip_temp,
> > > > .set_trip_temp = of_thermal_set_trip_temp,
> > > > .get_trip_hyst = of_thermal_get_trip_hyst,
> > > > @@ -827,6 +842,8 @@ static int thermal_of_populate_trip(struct
> > > > device_node *np,
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > > + trip->irq_mode = of_property_read_bool(np, "irq-mode");
> > > > +
> > > > /* Required for cooling map matching */
> > > > trip->np = np;
> > > > of_node_get(np);
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> > > > b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> > > > index 39fc812..6d41e08 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> > > > @@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ static void handle_critical_trips(struct
> > > > thermal_zone_device *tz,
> > > > static void handle_thermal_trip(struct thermal_zone_device
> > > > *tz, int
> > > > trip)
> > > > {
> > > > enum thermal_trip_type type;
> > > > + bool irq_mode = false;
> > > > /* Ignore disabled trip points */
> > > > if (test_bit(trip, &tz->trips_disabled))
> > > > @@ -419,9 +420,14 @@ static void handle_thermal_trip(struct
> > > > thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> > > > handle_non_critical_trips(tz, trip);
> > > > /*
> > > > * Alright, we handled this trip successfully.
> > > > - * So, start monitoring again.
> > > > + * So, start monitoring in polling mode if
> > > > + * trip is not using irq HW support.
> > > > */
> > > > - monitor_thermal_zone(tz);
> > > > + if (tz->ops->get_trip_irq_mode)
> > > > + tz->ops->get_trip_irq_mode(tz, trip, &irq_mode);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!irq_mode)
> > > > + monitor_thermal_zone(tz);
> > > > }
> > > handle_thermal_trip() is called from
> > > thermal_zone_device_update(), and
> > > it is invoked for every trip points.
> > > say, you have a passive trip point 1 that supports irq_mode, and
> > > another passive trip point 2 that does not support irq_mode,
> > > monitor_thermal_zone() is still called in handle_thermal_trip(tz,
> > > 2),
> > > and the passive timer will be activated anyway, do I miss
> > > something?
sorry that I missed this thread.
> > Yes, the passive timer will be activated in your example. It is
> > correct
> > behavior and does not break anything.
> > case 1: there is 'k' passive trip points which have irq_mode and 1
> > additional which does not have 'irq_mode', the framework will start
> > polling but skip check for those 'k' trip points.
> > case 2: all of the passive trip points have irq_mode set, the
> > framework
> > will not register 'scheduled_work' because it will not call
> > 'monitor_thermal_zone()'.
> > This is the case of most Exynos platforms, but there is one
> > exception
> > which has 'case 1' with 2 trip points not supporting irq_mode.
> Do you suggest to cover the 'case 1'?
So this solution does not cover case 1.
And for case 2, why not set passive_delay to 0? are they sharing the
same DT file?
> It would be possible after adding a new enum THERMAL_FRAMEWORK_POLL,
> then function:
hmmm, I think we can
1. use tz->passive to count the passive trip points that need passive
polling.
2. count tz->passive properly in the governors
3. always do passive polling when tz->passive > 0.
This will cover both cases, right?
some sample code to handle this in step_wise governor attached below,
what do you think?
thanks,
rui
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
index ee047ca..59d9a1d 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
@@ -121,8 +121,15 @@ static void update_passive_instance(struct
thermal_zone_device *tz,
* If value is +1, activate a passive instance.
* If value is -1, deactivate a passive instance.
*/
- if (type == THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE || type == THERMAL_TRIPS_NONE)
- tz->passive += value;
+ if (type != THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE && type != THERMAL_TRIPS_NONE)
+ return;
+ if (tz->ops->get_trip_irq_mode) {
+ if (tz->ops->get_trip_irq_mode(tz, trip, &irq_mode))
+ return;
+ if (irq_mode)
+ return;
+ }
+ tz->passive += value;
}
> thermal_zone_device_check() will call
> thermal_zone_device_update(tz, THERMAL_FRAMEWORK_POLL)
> and in handle_thermal_trip() implement something like:
> --------------8<----------------
> static void handle_thermal_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int
> trip)
> {
> enum thermal_trip_type type;
> bool irq_mode = false;
>
> /* Ignore disabled trip points */
> if (test_bit(trip, &tz->trips_disabled))
> return;
>
> if (tz->ops->get_trip_irq_mode)
> tz->ops->get_trip_irq_mode(tz, trip, &irq_mode)
>
> if (tz->notify_event == THERMAL_FRAMEWORK_POLL && irq_mode)
> return;
> ...
>
> if (!irq_mode)
> monitor_thermal_zone(tz);
> }
>
> ---------->8-----------------------
>
> I could implement it in v3 if you don't see that it add too much of
> mess
> and agree for this approach.
>
> Regards,
> Lukasz
>
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lukasz
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > rui
> > >
> > > >
> > > > static void update_temperature(struct thermal_zone_device
> > > > *tz)
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
> > > > index 5f4705f..b064565 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> > > > @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct thermal_zone_device_ops {
> > > > enum thermal_device_mode);
> > > > int (*get_trip_type) (struct thermal_zone_device *, int,
> > > > enum thermal_trip_type *);
> > > > + int (*get_trip_irq_mode) (struct thermal_zone_device *,
> > > > int,
> > > > bool *);
> > > > int (*get_trip_temp) (struct thermal_zone_device *, int,
> > > > int
> > > > *);
> > > > int (*set_trip_temp) (struct thermal_zone_device *, int,
> > > > int);
> > > > int (*get_trip_hyst) (struct thermal_zone_device *, int,
> > > > int
> > > > *);
> > > > @@ -196,6 +197,7 @@ struct thermal_zone_device {
> > > > struct thermal_attr *trip_temp_attrs;
> > > > struct thermal_attr *trip_type_attrs;
> > > > struct thermal_attr *trip_hyst_attrs;
> > > > + struct thermal_attr *trip_irq_mode_attrs;
> > > > void *devdata;
> > > > int trips;
> > > > unsigned long trips_disabled; /* bitmap for disabled
> > > > trips */
> > > > @@ -364,6 +366,8 @@ struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops {
> > > > * @temperature: temperature value in miliCelsius
> > > > * @hysteresis: relative hysteresis in miliCelsius
> > > > * @type: trip point type
> > > > + * @irq_mode: to not use polling in framework set support of
> > > > HW irq
> > > > (which will
> > > > + * be triggered when temperature reaches this level).
> > > > */
> > > > struct thermal_trip {
> > > > @@ -371,6 +375,7 @@ struct thermal_trip {
> > > > int temperature;
> > > > int hysteresis;
> > > > enum thermal_trip_type type;
> > > > + bool irq_mode;
> > > > };
> > > > /* Function declarations */
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists