linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nvme: fix out of bounds access in nvme_cqe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190110145008.GA21095@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 10 Jan 2019 07:50:08 -0700
From:   Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To:     Yao HongBo <yaohongbo@...wei.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com" <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>,
        "guohanjun@...wei.com" <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        "huawei.libin@...wei.com" <huawei.libin@...wei.com>,
        "thunder.leizhen@...wei.com" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        "tanxiaojun@...wei.com" <tanxiaojun@...wei.com>,
        "xiexiuqi@...wei.com" <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
        "yangyingliang@...wei.com" <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
        "cj.chengjian@...wei.com" <cj.chengjian@...wei.com>,
        "wxf.wang@...ilicon.com" <wxf.wang@...ilicon.com>,
        "axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
        "sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: fix out of bounds access in nvme_cqe_pending

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:54:59PM -0800, Yao HongBo wrote:
> On 1/10/2019 2:39 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:22:07AM +0800, Hongbo Yao wrote:
> >> There is an out of bounds array access in nvme_cqe_peding().
> >>
> >> When enable irq_thread for nvme interrupt, there is racing between the
> >> nvmeq->cq_head updating and reading.
> > 
> > Just curious: why did you enable this option?  Do you have a workload
> > where it matters?
> 
> Yes, there were a lot of hard interrupts reported when reading the nvme disk,
> the OS can not schedule and result in the soft lockup.so i enabled the irq_thread.

That seems a little unusual. We should be able to handle as many
interrupts as an nvme drive can send.