[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1547133048@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:15:40 +0100
From: Christoph Biedl <linux-kernel.bfrz@...chmal.in-ulm.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/170] 4.19.14-stable review
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. Building yesterday's
> release (v4.19.14) *failed*, bisect led to
>
> | commit a9935a12768851762089fda8e5a9daaf0231808e (HEAD)
> | Author: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> | Date: Mon Nov 26 18:12:00 2018 -0200
> |
> | powerpc/tm: Unset MSR[TS] if not recheckpointing
>
> Reverting that commit seems to be sufficient, build passes then.
>
> Additionally, neither 4.20 nor 5.0-rc1 show this problem. The
> | commit 6f5b9f018f4c7686fd944d920209d1382d320e4e upstream.
> builds as well, so I'll try to find the missing prerequisite next.
Cherry-picking
| commit 5c784c8414fba11b62e12439f11e109fb5751f38
| Author: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
| Date: Thu Aug 16 14:21:07 2018 -0300
|
| powerpc/tm: Remove msr_tm_active()
makes the build pass. Bruno, does this make sense?
Christoph
Powered by blists - more mailing lists