| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:28:57 +0000
From: Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"boris.brezillon@...tlin.com" <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
"marek.vasut@...il.com" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] spi: spi-mem: Add driver for NXP FlexSPI
controller
Hi Yogesh,
my comments below are mainly about things I already mentioned in my
review for v5 and about removing or simplifying some unnecessary or
complex code.
Also as I gathered from your conversation with Boris, there's still a
check for the length of the requested memory missing.
On 08.01.19 10:24, Yogesh Narayan Gaur wrote:
[...]
> +
> +static bool nxp_fspi_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> + const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> +{
> + struct nxp_fspi *f = spi_controller_get_devdata(mem->spi->master);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = nxp_fspi_check_buswidth(f, op->cmd.buswidth);
> +
> + if (op->addr.nbytes)
> + ret |= nxp_fspi_check_buswidth(f, op->addr.buswidth);
> +
> + if (op->dummy.nbytes)
> + ret |= nxp_fspi_check_buswidth(f, op->dummy.buswidth);
> +
> + if (op->data.nbytes)
> + ret |= nxp_fspi_check_buswidth(f, op->data.buswidth);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * The number of instructions needed for the op, needs
> + * to fit into a single LUT entry.
> + */
> + if (op->addr.nbytes +
> + (op->dummy.nbytes ? 1:0) +
> + (op->data.nbytes ? 1:0) > 6)
> + return false;
Actually this check was only needed in the QSPI driver, as we were using
LUT_MODE and there we needed one instruction for each address byte.
Here the number of instructions will always fit into one LUT entry.
Instead of this, a check for op->addr.nbytes > 4 (as already suggested
in my comments for v5) would make more sense. So we can make sure that
the address length passed in is supported (between 1 and 4 bytes).
> +
> + /* Max 64 dummy clock cycles supported */
> + if (op->dummy.buswidth &&
> + (op->dummy.nbytes * 8 / op->dummy.buswidth > 64))
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Max data length, check controller limits and alignment */
> + if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN &&
> + (op->data.nbytes > f->devtype_data->ahb_buf_size ||
> + (op->data.nbytes > f->devtype_data->rxfifo - 4 &&
> + !IS_ALIGNED(op->data.nbytes, 8))))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_OUT &&
> + op->data.nbytes > f->devtype_data->txfifo)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
[...]
> +static void nxp_fspi_select_mem(struct nxp_fspi *f, struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> + unsigned long rate = spi->max_speed_hz;
> + int ret;
> + uint64_t size_kb;
> +
> + /*
> + * Return, if previously selected slave device is same as current
> + * requested slave device.
> + */
> + if (f->selected == spi->chip_select)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Reset FLSHxxCR0 registers */
> + fspi_writel(f, 0, f->iobase + FSPI_FLSHA1CR0);
> + fspi_writel(f, 0, f->iobase + FSPI_FLSHA2CR0);
> + fspi_writel(f, 0, f->iobase + FSPI_FLSHB1CR0);
> + fspi_writel(f, 0, f->iobase + FSPI_FLSHB2CR0);
> +
> + /* Assign controller memory mapped space as size, KBytes, of flash. */
> + size_kb = FSPI_FLSHXCR0_SZ(f->memmap_phy_size);
> +
> + switch (spi->chip_select) {
> + case 0:
> + fspi_writel(f, size_kb, f->iobase + FSPI_FLSHA1CR0);
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + fspi_writel(f, size_kb, f->iobase + FSPI_FLSHA2CR0);
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + fspi_writel(f, size_kb, f->iobase + FSPI_FLSHB1CR0);
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + fspi_writel(f, size_kb, f->iobase + FSPI_FLSHB2CR0);
> + break;
> + }
The switch statement above can be replaced by:
fspi_writel(f, size_kb, f->iobase + FSPI_FLSHA1CR0 +
4 * spi->chip_select);
> +
> + dev_dbg(f->dev, "Slave device [CS:%x] selected\n", spi->chip_select);
> +
> + nxp_fspi_clk_disable_unprep(f);
> +
> + ret = clk_set_rate(f->clk, rate);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + ret = nxp_fspi_clk_prep_enable(f);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + f->selected = spi->chip_select;
> +}
> +
> +static void nxp_fspi_read_ahb(struct nxp_fspi *f, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> +{
> + u32 len = op->data.nbytes;
> +
> + /* Read out the data directly from the AHB buffer. */
> + memcpy_fromio(op->data.buf.in, (f->ahb_addr + op->addr.val), len);
> +}
> +
> +static void nxp_fspi_fill_txfifo(struct nxp_fspi *f,
> + const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> +{
> + void __iomem *base = f->iobase;
> + int i, j, ret;
> + int size, tmp, wm_size;
> + u32 data = 0;
> + u32 *txbuf = (u32 *) op->data.buf.out;
You can cast the u8 buffer to u32 and increment it by 1 in each cycle
below, or you can just use the u8 buffer and align and increment by 8 as
I did in my proposal for v5.
I still like my version better as it seems simpler and easier to
understand ;)
> +
> + /* clear the TX FIFO. */
> + fspi_writel(f, FSPI_IPTXFCR_CLR, base + FSPI_IPTXFCR);
> +
> + /* Default value of water mark level is 8 bytes. */
> + wm_size = 8;
> +
> + size = op->data.nbytes / wm_size;
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> + /* Wait for TXFIFO empty */
> + ret = fspi_readl_poll_tout(f, f->iobase + FSPI_INTR,
> + FSPI_INTR_IPTXWE, 0,
> + POLL_TOUT, true);
> + WARN_ON(ret);
> +
> + for (tmp = wm_size, j = 0; tmp > 0; tmp -= 4, j++)
I still think the inner loop should only be added when someone
implements watermark levels other than 8. It is of no use at the moment
and makes reading the code more difficult.
But if you insist on using it, please at least simplify the code.
What about: for (j = 0; j < (wm_size / 4); j++)
> + fspi_writel(f, *txbuf++, base + FSPI_TFDR + j * 4); > +
> + fspi_writel(f, FSPI_INTR_IPTXWE, base + FSPI_INTR);
> + }
> +
> + size = op->data.nbytes % wm_size;
> + if (size) {
> + /* Wait for TXFIFO empty */
> + ret = fspi_readl_poll_tout(f, f->iobase + FSPI_INTR,
> + FSPI_INTR_IPTXWE, 0,
> + POLL_TOUT, true);
> + WARN_ON(ret);
> +
> + for (tmp = size, j = 0; tmp > 0; tmp -= 4, j++) {
Same here: for (j = 0; j < (size / 4); j++) {
> + data = 0;
> + memcpy(&data, txbuf++, 4);
> + fspi_writel(f, data, base + FSPI_TFDR + j * 4);
> + }
> + fspi_writel(f, FSPI_INTR_IPTXWE, base + FSPI_INTR);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void nxp_fspi_read_rxfifo(struct nxp_fspi *f,
> + const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> +{
> + void __iomem *base = f->iobase;
> + int i, j;
> + int size, tmp_size, wm_size, ret;
> + u32 tmp = 0;
> + u8 *buf = op->data.buf.in;
> + u32 len = op->data.nbytes;
> +
> + /* Default value of water mark level is 8 bytes. */
> + wm_size = 8;
> +
> + while (len > 0) {
What is this outer loop good for? Below you are first reading aligned to
wm_size and then the remaining bytes. Why would you need to repeat that?
It looks like the loop will always be executed only once.
> + size = len / wm_size;
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> + /* Wait for RXFIFO available */
> + ret = fspi_readl_poll_tout(f, f->iobase + FSPI_INTR,
> + FSPI_INTR_IPRXWA, 0,
> + POLL_TOUT, true);
> + WARN_ON(ret);
> +
> + for (tmp_size = wm_size, j = 0; tmp_size > 0;
> + tmp_size -= 4, j++, buf += 4) {
What about: for (j = 0; j < (wm_size / 4); j++, buf += 4) {
> + tmp = fspi_readl(f, base + FSPI_RFDR + j * 4);
> + memcpy(buf, &tmp, 4);
> + }
> + /* move the FIFO pointer */
> + fspi_writel(f, FSPI_INTR_IPRXWA, base + FSPI_INTR);
> + len -= wm_size;
> + }
> +
> + size = len % wm_size;
> + if (size) {
> + /* Wait for RXFIFO available */
> + ret = fspi_readl_poll_tout(f, f->iobase + FSPI_INTR,
> + FSPI_INTR_IPRXWA, 0,
> + POLL_TOUT, true);
> + WARN_ON(ret);
> +
> + for (j = 0; len > 0; len -= size, j++, buf += size) {
> + tmp = fspi_readl(f, base + FSPI_RFDR + j * 4);
> + size = len < 4 ? len : 4;
What about: size = min(len, 4);
> + memcpy(buf, &tmp, size);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* invalid the RXFIFO */
> + fspi_writel(f, FSPI_IPRXFCR_CLR, base + FSPI_IPRXFCR);
> + /* move the FIFO pointer */
> + fspi_writel(f, FSPI_INTR_IPRXWA, base + FSPI_INTR);
> + }
> +}
Thanks,
Frieder
Powered by blists - more mailing lists