[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190110173941.GB24566@nishad>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:09:42 +0530
From: Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@...il.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@...il.com>,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nishadkamdar@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] staging: greybus: gpio: Use gpiochip_get_data()
in place of gpio_chip_to_gb_gpio_controller()
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:58:24AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 08:21:00PM +0530, Nishad Kamdar wrote:
> > This patch drops gpio_chip_to_gb_gpio_controller(),
> > and uses gpiochip_get_data() to retrieve the container
> > of struct gpio_chip.
>
> So this will break the driver, since gpiochip_add() sets the data
> pointer to NULL.
>
> These kind of changes are getting too complicated to do without
> something to test against. We had a module simulator at one point, but
> not sure what the state of that is now.
>
Ok, I get it.
> I appreciate the effort though, and since we already started, let's try
> to finish, but please drop this patch for now.
>
Ok I'll do that.
> Johan
Thanks for the review.
Regards,
Nishad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists