[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <154708898461.6325.17046972809561067053.stgit@devbox>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 11:56:24 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] kprobes: Search non-suffixed symbol in blacklist
Newer gcc can generate some different instances of a function
with suffixed symbols if the function is optimized and only
has a part of that. (e.g. .constprop, .part etc.)
In this case, it is not enough to check the entry of kprobe
blacklist because it only records non-suffixed symbol address.
To fix this issue, search non-suffixed symbol in blacklist if
given address is within a symbol which has a suffix.
Note that this can cause false positive cases if a kprobe-safe
function is optimized to suffixed instance and has same name
symbol which is blacklisted.
But I would like to chose a fail-safe design for this issue.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index e8c76164f541..faa519f07aad 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ bool __weak arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
addr < (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_end;
}
-bool within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
+static bool __within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
{
struct kprobe_blacklist_entry *ent;
@@ -1410,7 +1410,26 @@ bool within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
if (addr >= ent->start_addr && addr < ent->end_addr)
return true;
}
+ return false;
+}
+bool within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
+{
+ char symname[KSYM_NAME_LEN], *p;
+
+ if (__within_kprobe_blacklist(addr))
+ return true;
+
+ /* Check if the address is on a suffixed-symbol */
+ if (!lookup_symbol_name(addr, symname)) {
+ p = strchr(symname, '.');
+ if (!p)
+ return false;
+ *p = '\0';
+ addr = (unsigned long)kprobe_lookup_name(symname, 0);
+ if (addr)
+ return __within_kprobe_blacklist(addr);
+ }
return false;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists