[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190110180752.f4cnunadzzkev24m@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:07:52 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: "Hutter, Tony" <hutter2@...l.gov>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/fpu: Don't export __kernel_fpu_{begin,end}()
On 2019-01-10 17:32:58 [+0000], Hutter, Tony wrote:
> > But since when did out-of-tree modules use __kernel_fpu_begin? It's an
> > x86-only thing, and shouldn't really be used by anyone, right?
>
> ZFS on Linux uses it for checksums. Its removal is currently breaking ZFS builds against 5.0:
So btrfs uses crc32c() / kernel's crypto API for that and ZFS can't?
Well the crypto API is GPL only exported so that won't work. crc32c() is
EXPORT_SYMBOL() so it would work.
On the other hand it does not look right to provide a EXPORT_SYMBOL
wrapper around a GPL only interface…
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists