lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190110182948.GB7748@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:29:48 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Christoph Biedl <linux-kernel.bfrz@...chmal.in-ulm.de>,
        Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/170] 4.19.14-stable review

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 07:40:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 04:15:40PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Christoph Biedl wrote...
> > 
> > > Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. Building yesterday's
> > > release (v4.19.14) *failed*, bisect led to
> > >
> > > | commit a9935a12768851762089fda8e5a9daaf0231808e (HEAD)
> > > | Author: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> > > | Date:   Mon Nov 26 18:12:00 2018 -0200
> > > |
> > > |     powerpc/tm: Unset MSR[TS] if not recheckpointing
> > >
> > > Reverting that commit seems to be sufficient, build passes then.
> > >
> > > Additionally, neither 4.20 nor 5.0-rc1 show this problem. The
> > > | commit 6f5b9f018f4c7686fd944d920209d1382d320e4e upstream.
> > > builds as well, so I'll try to find the missing prerequisite next.
> > 
> > Cherry-picking
> > 
> > | commit 5c784c8414fba11b62e12439f11e109fb5751f38
> > | Author: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> > | Date:   Thu Aug 16 14:21:07 2018 -0300
> > |
> > |     powerpc/tm: Remove msr_tm_active()
> > 
> > makes the build pass. Bruno, does this make sense?
> > 
> As I had reported and suggested well before the release.
> According to Greg those responsible for the patch series rejected that.

Ok, Breno and Christoph, what should I do here?  Should I drop this
patch in the tree or add this new one?  Ideally I can fix this soon as I
don't like having broken trees out there...

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ