[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50080040-1157-49be-b6b3-873f07832bfb@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:57:40 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 35/41] scsi: ppa: mark expected switch fall-through
Hi,
Friendly ping (second one):
Who can ack/review/take this patch, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 12/19/18 6:07 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Friendly ping:
>
> Who can ack or review this patch, please?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On 11/27/18 10:33 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114988 ("Missing break in switch")
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/ppa.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ppa.c b/drivers/scsi/ppa.c
>> index ee86a0c62dbf..d29999ba5458 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ppa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ppa.c
>> @@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ static int ppa_engine(ppa_struct *dev, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>> }
>> cmd->SCp.phase++;
>> }
>> + /* fall through */
>> case 2: /* Phase 2 - We are now talking to the scsi bus */
>> if (!ppa_select(dev, scmd_id(cmd))) {
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists