[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99e33184-09ca-4b74-cdab-c87160aac255@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:58:33 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@...ctrozaur.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/41] scsi: osd: osd_initiator: mark expected switch
fall-throughs
Hi,
Friendly ping (second one):
Who can ack/review/take this patch, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 12/19/18 6:07 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Friendly ping:
>
> Who can ack or review this patch, please?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On 11/27/18 10:32 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
>> index 60cf7c5eb880..cb26f26d5ec1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
>> @@ -1849,6 +1849,7 @@ int osd_req_decode_sense_full(struct osd_request *or,
>> 32, 1, dump, sizeof(dump), true);
>> OSD_SENSE_PRINT2("response_integrity [%s]\n", dump);
>> }
>> + /* fall through */
>> case osd_sense_attribute_identification:
>> {
>> struct osd_sense_attributes_data_descriptor
>> @@ -1879,7 +1880,7 @@ int osd_req_decode_sense_full(struct osd_request *or,
>> attr_page, attr_id);
>> }
>> }
>> - /*These are not legal for OSD*/
>> + /* fall through - These are not legal for OSD */
>> case scsi_sense_field_replaceable_unit:
>> OSD_SENSE_PRINT2("scsi_sense_field_replaceable_unit\n");
>> break;
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists