[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190110201636.GA7074@ravnborg.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 21:16:36 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] drm/atmel-hlcdc: fix plane clipping/rotation issues
Hi Peter.
(Hijacking this thread as I lost the orginal mails)
> >
> > I found an unfortunate issue while recoding plane handling to use
> > drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(). The driver rotates clockwise,
> > which is not correct. I simply fixed it (patch 1/4), but maybe that
> > will cause regressions for unsuspecting users who simply assumed
> > that the clockwise rotation was correct? I don't know what to do
> > about that? Adding an option to get the old broken behavior seems
> > useless, wouldn't it be just as easy to just fix whatever app to
> > rotate the other way instead of adding an option somewhere?
>
> Hm, rotation support has been added before the standard rotation
> property was created, and at that time I assumed rotation was clockwise
> (which apparently was an unwise choice). Anyway, I don't have a
> solution for this problem, so I'll let Nicolas decide if it's
> acceptable to change the rotation behavior.
>
> >
> > I have only tested this series on sama5d3, but I did check the docs
> > for various other chips (sama5d2, sama5d4, sam9n12, sam9g15, sam9g35
> > and sam9x35) supported by the driver (relevant to patch 4/4).
I wonder if, when this code path is anyway touched, could benefit
from drm_rect_rotate().
It is obviously not a simple replacement, but could it be used then
I hope the resulting code is simpler.
Sam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists