[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190111033216.u3ic5it3lygot4sb@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:02:16 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] arm64: dts: sdm845: Increase alert trip point to
95 degrees
On 10-01-19, 12:00, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Viresh helped me understand that we currently need to add cooling
> device entries for all CPUs to the DT, even though at most one will be
> active per freq domain at any time (I wonder if this could be changed
> though).
Actually we were only adding cooling-cells in CPU0 until now and I
fixed that, so that is going to stay :)
The idea is that the hardware should be described properly and not
partially. Even if all the CPUs are part of the same freq-domain, they
are all capable of being a cooling device here and the DT should
describe that. Kernel will ofcourse create a single cooling device.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists