[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190111170711.21059fe7@mschwideX1>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:07:11 +0100
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390/smp: Fix calling smp_call_ipl_cpu() from ipl
CPU
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:18:22 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> When calling smp_call_ipl_cpu() from the IPL CPU, we will try to read
> from pcpu_devices->lowcore. However, due to prefixing, that will result
> in reading from absolute address 0 on that CPU. We have to go via the
> actual lowcore instead.
>
> This means that right now, we will read lc->nodat_stack == 0 and
> therfore work on a very wrong stack.
>
> This BUG essentially broke rebooting under QEMU TCG (which will report
> a low address protection exception). And checking under KVM, it is
> also broken under KVM. With 1 VCPU it can be easily triggered.
>
> :/# echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq
> :/# echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger
> [ 28.476745] sysrq: SysRq : Resetting
> [ 28.476793] Kernel stack overflow.
> [ 28.476817] CPU: 0 PID: 424 Comm: sh Not tainted 5.0.0-rc1+ #13
> [ 28.476820] Hardware name: IBM 2964 NE1 716 (KVM/Linux)
> [ 28.476826] Krnl PSW : 0400c00180000000 0000000000115c0c (pcpu_delegate+0x12c/0x140)
> [ 28.476861] R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:0 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3
> [ 28.476863] Krnl GPRS: ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 000000000010dff8 0000000000000000
> [ 28.476864] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000ab7090 000003e0006efbf0
> [ 28.476864] 000000000010dff8 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [ 28.476865] 000000007fffc000 0000000000730408 000003e0006efc58 0000000000000000
> [ 28.476887] Krnl Code: 0000000000115bfe: 4170f000 la %r7,0(%r15)
> [ 28.476887] 0000000000115c02: 41f0a000 la %r15,0(%r10)
> [ 28.476887] #0000000000115c06: e370f0980024 stg %r7,152(%r15)
> [ 28.476887] >0000000000115c0c: c0e5fffff86e brasl %r14,114ce8
> [ 28.476887] 0000000000115c12: 41f07000 la %r15,0(%r7)
> [ 28.476887] 0000000000115c16: a7f4ffa8 brc 15,115b66
> [ 28.476887] 0000000000115c1a: 0707 bcr 0,%r7
> [ 28.476887] 0000000000115c1c: 0707 bcr 0,%r7
> [ 28.476901] Call Trace:
> [ 28.476902] Last Breaking-Event-Address:
> [ 28.476920] [<0000000000a01c4a>] arch_call_rest_init+0x22/0x80
> [ 28.476927] Kernel panic - not syncing: Corrupt kernel stack, can't continue.
> [ 28.476930] CPU: 0 PID: 424 Comm: sh Not tainted 5.0.0-rc1+ #13
> [ 28.476932] Hardware name: IBM 2964 NE1 716 (KVM/Linux)
> [ 28.476932] Call Trace:
>
> Reported-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
> index f82b3d3c36e2..be32dd0b4191 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -381,8 +381,13 @@ void smp_call_online_cpu(void (*func)(void *), void *data)
> */
> void smp_call_ipl_cpu(void (*func)(void *), void *data)
> {
> + struct lowcore *lc = pcpu_devices->lowcore;
> +
> + if (pcpu_devices[0].address == stap())
> + lc = &S390_lowcore;
> +
> pcpu_delegate(&pcpu_devices[0], func, data,
> - pcpu_devices->lowcore->nodat_stack);
> + lc->nodat_stack);
> }
>
> int smp_find_processor_id(u16 address)
Uhh, subtle. With EDAT-1 this sort of works because the lowcore of CPU #0
is allocated in an area of the kernel address space that is backed with 1M
pages. It is nevertheless broken.
I have added
Fixes: 2f859d0dad81 ("s390/smp: reduce size of struct pcpu")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.0+
and will queue the patch for the next pull. Thanks!
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists