[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1901111649580.6487@macbook-air>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:52:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: perf: rdpmc bug when viewing all procs on remote cpu
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2019, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> > > However if you create an all-process attached to CPU event:
> > > perf_event_open(attr, -1, X, -1, 0);
> > > the mmap event index is set as if this were a valid event and so the rdpmc
> > > succeeds even though it shouldn't (we're trying to read an event value
> > > on a remote cpu with a local rdpmc).
so on further looking at the code, it doesn't appear that rdpmc events are
explicitly marked as unavailable in the attach-cpu or attach-pid case,
it's just by luck the check for PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE catches most of
the cases?
should an explicit check be added to zero out userpg->index in cases where
the event being measured is running on a different core?
Vince
Powered by blists - more mailing lists