lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 11 Jan 2019 06:40:58 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        "Hutter, Tony" <hutter2@...l.gov>,
        Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@...il.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Kash Pande <kash@...pleback.net>
Subject: Re: x86/fpu: Don't export __kernel_fpu_{begin,end}()

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 06:04:07AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 07:24:13PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > My tolerance for ZFS is pretty non-existant.  Sun explicitly did not
> > want their code to work on Linux, so why would we do extra work to get
> > their code to work properly?
> 
> ZoL facilitates seamless r/w cross-mounting with macOS, something no
> other filesystem allows, and that feature is critical for me to work
> on Linux drivers for Mac hardware.  Please don't make life harder than
> necessary for developers like me.  Your "extra work" argument seems
> disingenuous to me, Sebastian's patch is causing extra work for
> ZFS developers, not the kernel community.  The maintenance burden
> for the kernel community to retain the export is zero.

Sorry, no, we do not keep symbols exported for no in-kernel users.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ