[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1901102153570.22105@viisi.sifive.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:06:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
To: Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>
cc: "Palmpalmer@...ive.com" <palmer@...ive.com>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: defconfig: Enable Generic PCIE by default
Hi Alistair,
Looks like you're still sending patches to "palmpalmer" ?
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019, Alistair Francis wrote:
> Enable generic PCIe by default in the RISC-V defconfig, this allows us
> to use QEMU's PCIe support out of the box.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/configs/defconfig | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/configs/defconfig b/arch/riscv/configs/defconfig
> index f399659d3b8d..ccfd3f05223c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/configs/defconfig
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ CONFIG_EXPERT=y
> CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y
> CONFIG_SMP=y
> CONFIG_PCI=y
> +CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS=y
> +CONFIG_PCI_HOST_GENERIC=y
> CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX=y
> CONFIG_MODULES=y
> CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y
> @@ -77,5 +79,6 @@ CONFIG_NFS_V4_1=y
> CONFIG_NFS_V4_2=y
> CONFIG_ROOT_NFS=y
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_HASH=y
> +CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_VIRTIO=y
> CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y
> # CONFIG_RCU_TRACE is not set
Not sure what commit this patch is against - I picked v5.0-rc1. Before
applying your patch, I generated a seedconfig with "make defconfig
savedefconfig; mv defconfig defconfig.1". Then applied your patch and did
a "make defconfig savedefconfig" and then ran "diff -u defconfig.1
defconfig".
That should have shown me just the patch above. But it also included a
line removing CONFIG_RAS=y. I am sorry to ask you to fix such a nitpicky
item, but it is good practice for these defconfig patches. Otherwise the
defconfig deltas gradually get out of control.
When you repost it, if you verify that the ./defconfig delta from running
"make savedefconfig" before and after your patch applied is simply your
patch, then feel free to add a Reviewed-by: line from my E-mail address
above.
- Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists