linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 10/41] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcs_lport: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CY4PR18MB1253EC0F2D3C0F4AE86AEA02D3850@CY4PR18MB1253.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Jan 2019 06:33:17 +0000
From:   Sudarsana Reddy Kalluru <skalluru@...vell.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumurthy@...gic.com>,
        Sudarsana Kalluru <sudarsana.kalluru@...gic.com>
CC:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 10/41] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcs_lport: Mark expected switch
 fall-throughs


-----Original Message-----
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva [mailto:gustavo@...eddedor.com] 
Sent: 11 January 2019 01:42
To: Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumurthy@...gic.com>; Sudarsana Kalluru <sudarsana.kalluru@...gic.com>
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>; Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/41] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcs_lport: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

External Email

Hi,

Friendly ping (second one):

Who can ack/review/take this patch, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 12/19/18 9:39 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Friendly ping:
>
> Who can ack or review this patch, please?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On 11/27/18 10:27 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases 
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "!!! fall through !!!"
>> with a "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to 
>> find.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c | 8 ++------
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c 
>> b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
>> index b4f2c1d8742e..646f09f66443 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
>> @@ -6430,9 +6430,7 @@ bfa_fcs_vport_sm_logo_for_stop(struct bfa_fcs_vport_s *vport,
>>       switch (event) {
>>       case BFA_FCS_VPORT_SM_OFFLINE:
>>           bfa_sm_send_event(vport->lps, BFA_LPS_SM_OFFLINE);
>> -        /*
>> -         * !!! fall through !!!
>> -         */
>> +        /* fall through */
>>       case BFA_FCS_VPORT_SM_RSP_OK:
>>       case BFA_FCS_VPORT_SM_RSP_ERROR:
>> @@ -6458,9 +6456,7 @@ bfa_fcs_vport_sm_logo(struct bfa_fcs_vport_s *vport,
>>       switch (event) {
>>       case BFA_FCS_VPORT_SM_OFFLINE:
>>           bfa_sm_send_event(vport->lps, BFA_LPS_SM_OFFLINE);
>> -        /*
>> -         * !!! fall through !!!
>> -         */
>> +        /* fall through */
>>       case BFA_FCS_VPORT_SM_RSP_OK:
>>       case BFA_FCS_VPORT_SM_RSP_ERROR:
>>

Acked-by: Sudarsana Kalluru <Sudarsana.Kalluru@...gic.com>