[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1547166387-19785-3-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:26:26 -0800
From: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@...opsys.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] fs: inode_set_flags() replace opencoded set_mask_bits()
It seems that 5f16f3225b0624 and 00a1a053ebe5, both with same commitlog
("ext4: atomically set inode->i_flags in ext4_set_inode_flags()")
introduced the set_mask_bits API, but somehow missed not using it in
ext4 in the end
Also, set_mask_bits is used in fs quite a bit and we can possibly come up
with a generic llsc based implementation (w/o the cmpxchg loop)
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
---
fs/inode.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 0cd47fe0dbe5..799b0c4beda8 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -2096,14 +2096,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_dio_wait);
void inode_set_flags(struct inode *inode, unsigned int flags,
unsigned int mask)
{
- unsigned int old_flags, new_flags;
-
WARN_ON_ONCE(flags & ~mask);
- do {
- old_flags = READ_ONCE(inode->i_flags);
- new_flags = (old_flags & ~mask) | flags;
- } while (unlikely(cmpxchg(&inode->i_flags, old_flags,
- new_flags) != old_flags));
+ set_mask_bits(&inode->i_flags, mask, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_set_flags);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists