[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pnt3od02.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:43:41 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To: Manu Gautam <mgautam@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Manu Gautam <mgautam@...eaurora.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"open list\:DESIGNWARE USB3 DRD IP DRIVER"
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: Fail request submission if it was already queued
Hi,
Manu Gautam <mgautam@...eaurora.org> writes:
> If a function driver tries to re-submit an already queued request,
> it can results in corruption of pending/started request lists.
> Catch such conditions and fail the request submission to DCD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manu Gautam <mgautam@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> index 679c12e14522..51716c6b286a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> @@ -1290,6 +1290,12 @@ static int __dwc3_gadget_ep_queue(struct dwc3_ep *dep, struct dwc3_request *req)
> &req->request, req->dep->name))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (req->request.status == -EINPROGRESS) {
this test is really not enough. What if gadget driver set status to
EINPROGRESS before submission? A better check would involve making sure
req isn't part of dep->pending_list or dep->started_list or
dep->cancelled_list. It's clear that this won't work very well as the
amount of requests grow.
Anyway, which gadget driver did this? Why is it only affecting dwc3?
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists