[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf825cf1-14b1-b1bf-d433-f8b552bb9ace@microchip.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:49:39 +0000
From: <Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com>
To: <luis.oliveira@...opsys.com>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <joao.pinto@...opsys.com>, <festevam@...il.com>,
<mchehab@...nel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<arnd@...db.de>, <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
<narmstrong@...libre.com>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<treding@...dia.com>, <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
<todor.tomov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [V3, 4/4] media: platform: dwc: Add MIPI CSI-2 controller driver
On 11.01.2019 10:11, Luis de Oliveira wrote:
>
>
> On 11-Jan-19 7:25, Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10.01.2019 18:18, Luis de Oliveira wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09-Jan-19 13:07, Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 19.10.2018 15:52, Luis Oliveira wrote:
>>>>> Add the Synopsys MIPI CSI-2 controller driver. This
>>>>> controller driver is divided in platform dependent functions
>>>>> and core functions. It also includes a platform for future
>>>>> DesignWare drivers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Luis Oliveira <lolivei@...opsys.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changelog
>>>>> v2-V3
>>>>> - exposed IPI settings to userspace
>>>>> - fixed headers
>>>>>
>>>>> MAINTAINERS | 11 +
>>>>> drivers/media/platform/dwc/Kconfig | 30 +-
>>>>> drivers/media/platform/dwc/Makefile | 2 +
>>>>> drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-csi-plat.c | 699 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-csi-plat.h | 77 ++++
>>>>> drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-mipi-csi.c | 494 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-mipi-csi.h | 202 +++++++++
>>>>> include/media/dwc/dw-mipi-csi-pltfrm.h | 102 +++++
>>>>> 8 files changed, 1616 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-csi-plat.c
>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-csi-plat.h
>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-mipi-csi.c
>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-mipi-csi.h
>>>>> create mode 100644 include/media/dwc/dw-mipi-csi-pltfrm.h
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>>> +/* Video formats supported by the MIPI CSI-2 */
>>>>> +const struct mipi_fmt dw_mipi_csi_formats[] = {
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + /* RAW 8 */
>>>>> + .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR8_1X8,
>>>>> + .depth = 8,
>>>>> + },
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + /* RAW 10 */
>>>>> + .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_2X8_PADHI_BE,
>>>>> + .depth = 10,
>>>>> + },
>>>>
>>>> Hi Luis,
>>>>
>>>> Any reason why RAW12 format is not handled here ?
>>>>
>>>> Here, namely MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR12_1X12 etc.
>>>>
>>> Hi Eugen,
>>>
>>> My Hw testing setup currently does not support it, so I didn't add it.
>>>
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + /* RGB 565 */
>>>>> + .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB565_2X8_BE,
>>>>> + .depth = 16,
>>>>> + },
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + /* BGR 565 */
>>>>> + .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB565_2X8_LE,
>>>>> + .depth = 16,
>>>>> + },
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + /* RGB 888 */
>>>>> + .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_2X12_LE,
>>>>> + .depth = 24,
>>>>> + },
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + /* BGR 888 */
>>>>> + .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_2X12_BE,
>>>>> + .depth = 24,
>>>>> + },
>>>>> +};
>>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +void dw_mipi_csi_set_ipi_fmt(struct mipi_csi_dev *csi_dev)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct device *dev = csi_dev->dev;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (csi_dev->ipi_dt)
>>>>> + dw_mipi_csi_write(csi_dev, reg.IPI_DATA_TYPE, csi_dev->ipi_dt);
>>>>> + else {
>>>>> + switch (csi_dev->fmt->code) {
>>>>> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB565_2X8_BE:
>>>>> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB565_2X8_LE:
>>>>> + dw_mipi_csi_write(csi_dev,
>>>>> + reg.IPI_DATA_TYPE, CSI_2_RGB565);
>>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "DT: RGB 565");
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_2X12_LE:
>>>>> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_2X12_BE:
>>>>> + dw_mipi_csi_write(csi_dev,
>>>>> + reg.IPI_DATA_TYPE, CSI_2_RGB888);
>>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "DT: RGB 888");
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_2X8_PADHI_BE:
>>>>> + dw_mipi_csi_write(csi_dev,
>>>>> + reg.IPI_DATA_TYPE, CSI_2_RAW10);
>>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "DT: RAW 10");
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR8_1X8:
>>>>> + dw_mipi_csi_write(csi_dev,
>>>>> + reg.IPI_DATA_TYPE, CSI_2_RAW8);
>>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "DT: RAW 8");
>>>>> + break;
>>>>
>>>> Same here, in CSI_2_RAW12 case it will default to a RGB565 case.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Eugen
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I will try to add the support for this data type in my next patchset if not I
>>> will flag it as unsupported for now in the commit message and code.
>>
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>> I am currently trying to see if your driver works , and I need the RAW12
>> type, that's why I am asking about it.
>>
>> One question related to the subdevice you create here, how do you
>> register this subdev into the media subsystem ? sync or async, or not at
>> all ?
>> After the driver probes, there is no call to the set format functions, I
>> added a node inside the Device tree, I see you are registering media
>> pads, but the other endpoint needs to be an async waiting for completion
>> node or your subdev registers in some other way ? (maybe some link
>> validation required ?)
>>
>> Thanks for your help,
>>
>> Eugen
>>
> Hi Eugen,
>
> On top of this dphy+controller solution I use a wrapper driver that binds this
> two together and create the links.
> I use V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE and v4l2_async_notifier_operations to match and
> bound all my sensors until completion.
>
> My dt looks like this:
>
> camera wrapper {
>
> video_dev {
> dma
> }
> vif_1 @reg {
> ...
> }
> ..
> vif_n @reg {
> ...
> }
> csi_1 @reg {
> ...
> phy
> port 1..2 {}
> }
> csi_n @reg {
> ...
> phy
> port 1..2 {}
> }
>
> Fundamentally It is the same principle as this
> drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/media-dev.c but my solution has more entities
> for testing purposes.
> Check the exynos4-is because is very similar to my top solution.
>
> When I started doing this patchset I was thinking of sending the wrapper also
> but I then decided to not do it because it is very narrow and focused in my
> tests. But I can include it in v4 if everyone think its best.
Ok, I understand how you did, but do you have a public tree with this
code which I can access to have a look on exactly how you connected
everything ?
Thanks
>
> Thank you,
> Luis
>>>
>>> Thanks for your review,
>>> Luis
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + default:
>>>>> + dw_mipi_csi_write(csi_dev,
>>>>> + reg.IPI_DATA_TYPE, CSI_2_RGB565);
>>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Error");
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists