lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFA6WYM7JpE+h+6FC-YmqjyLo-xopeMg=d0BhOLx1C+N-tsZvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:27:00 +0530
From:   Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" 
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>, mpm@...enic.com,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>, tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] tee: add supp_nowait flag in tee_context struct

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 15:24, Daniel Thompson
<daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:00:49PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 19:53, Daniel Thompson
> > <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
> > > > index 9ddb89e..5d6c317 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
> > > > @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ static int tee_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> > > >       if (IS_ERR(ctx))
> > > >               return PTR_ERR(ctx);
> > > >
> > > > +     ctx->supp_nowait = false;
> > > >       filp->private_data = ctx;
> > > >       return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > > @@ -981,6 +982,7 @@ tee_client_open_context(struct tee_context *start,
> > > >       } while (IS_ERR(ctx) && PTR_ERR(ctx) != -ENOMEM);
> > > >
> > > >       put_device(put_dev);
> > > > +     ctx->supp_nowait = true;
> > >
> > > Why automatically set supp_nowait inside open_context() ?
> > >
> >
> > I think this is the default behaviour (non-blocking request) that any
> > in kernel client would expect. Also this flag could be configured
> > again before call to open_session() if any in kernel client requires
> > different behaviour.
>
> Makes sense. I think this is a deep enough behaviour to warrant proper
> commenting though.
>

Sure, will add comments.

-Sumit

>
> Daniel.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ