lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:02:53 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Esme <esploit@...tonmail.ch> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, JJiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: PROBLEM: syzkaller found / reduced C repro for non-fatal unchecked MSR access error On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:21:16PM +0000, Esme wrote: > Attached is a fairly small C repro I did not see any references to > this possible flaw (unchecked MSR access) in relation to > __NR_perf_event_open > > Attached is the config directly extracted from proc. This is the call > stack in relation to the MSR access error (5.0.0-rc1+), I get a very > similar stack running this test case on a stock Ubuntu > "4.18.0-11-generic" (pasted after this one). > -- Esme > > [ 70.228744] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0xc0010000 (tried to write 0x0000020000130076) at rIP: 0xffffffff812dde28 (native_write_msr+0x8/0x30) That's K7_EVNTSEL0. What kind of hardware are you running this on?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists