[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190111100652.vw5dhopo5vyc24he@brauner.io>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:06:53 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: tkjos@...roid.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arve@...roid.com,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, maco@...roid.com,
tkjos@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] binderfs: reserve devices for initial mount
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:18:18AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 12:32:19PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > The binderfs instance in the initial ipc namespace will always have a
> > reserve of 4 binder devices unless explicitly capped by specifying a lower
> > value via the "max" mount option.
> > This ensures when binder devices are removed (on accident or on purpose)
> > they can always be recreated without risking that all minor numbers have
> > already been used up.
> >
> > Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - patch unchanged
> > v1:
> > - patch introduced
> > v0:
> > - patch not present
> > ---
> > drivers/android/binderfs.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> What did you make this patch against? It doesn't apply cleanly so I
> don't want to take it until we get everything synced up properly
> together :(
>
> I'll apply patch 1/2 now, can you rebase and resend this one?
Yup. I'll rebase on top of char-misc-linus now. :)
Thanks!
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists