lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:05:38 -0700 From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> To: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>, "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 perf, bpf-next 1/7] perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL On 1/10/19 12:45 PM, Song Liu wrote: > Could you please share your feedback on PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT for auditing > use cases? Google shows Daniel was the one looking at audit use cases: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg250728.html My comment was that using a PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT limits the usability with combinations of other tracepoints (e.g, scheduling) when tracing processes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists