[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a96dec9-ac00-5b3c-e532-2c8ef0e3a537@ghiti.fr>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 14:58:27 +0100
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <aghiti@...em.com>
Cc: aou@...s.berkeley.edu, catalin.marinas@....com, palmer@...ive.com,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, atish.patra@....com,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mike.kravetz@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] riscv: Introduce huge page support for 32/64bit
kernel
On 01/11/2019 07:18 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hello Alexandre,
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>
>> This patch implements both 4MB huge page support for 32bit kernel
>> and 2MB/1GB huge pages support for 64bit kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <aghiti@...em.com>
> This patch introduces a few minor checkpatch and strict checkpatch
> warnings, when tested against both v4.20 and v5.0-rc1 checkpatch versions.
> Could you fix those? The other two patches in the series look OK from
> that point of view.
Yes, I had noted those warnings:
- the SPDX warning is weird, in all *.c files, the script seems to
accept only
"// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0" and not "/*
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */".
But on *.h files, this the contrary, maybe I missed something, I am going
to take a look at the script spdxcheck.py.
Note that kernel/ftrace.c and kernel/perf_event.c raise the same
strange warning.
- I'll change the "printk(KERN_ERR" into a pr_err.
- I'll ignore the last warning regarding the new file.
Thanks for your feedback Paul,
Alex
>
>
> - Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists