[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190111131050.653863390@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:08:00 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 31/88] ALSA: emu10k1: Fix potential Spectre v1 vulnerabilities
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
commit 5ae4f61f012a097df93de2285070ec8e34716d29 upstream.
ipcm->substream is indirectly controlled by user-space, hence leading to
a potential exploitation of the Spectre variant 1 vulnerability.
This issue was detected with the help of Smatch:
sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c:1031 snd_emu10k1_ipcm_poke() warn: potential spectre issue 'emu->fx8010.pcm' [r] (local cap)
sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c:1075 snd_emu10k1_ipcm_peek() warn: potential spectre issue 'emu->fx8010.pcm' [r] (local cap)
Fix this by sanitizing ipcm->substream before using it to index emu->fx8010.pcm
Notice that given that speculation windows are large, the policy is
to kill the speculation on the first load and not worry if it can be
completed with a dependent load/store [1].
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152449131114778&w=2
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c
+++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
+#include <linux/nospec.h>
#include <sound/core.h>
#include <sound/tlv.h>
@@ -1000,6 +1001,8 @@ static int snd_emu10k1_ipcm_poke(struct
if (ipcm->substream >= EMU10K1_FX8010_PCM_COUNT)
return -EINVAL;
+ ipcm->substream = array_index_nospec(ipcm->substream,
+ EMU10K1_FX8010_PCM_COUNT);
if (ipcm->channels > 32)
return -EINVAL;
pcm = &emu->fx8010.pcm[ipcm->substream];
@@ -1046,6 +1049,8 @@ static int snd_emu10k1_ipcm_peek(struct
if (ipcm->substream >= EMU10K1_FX8010_PCM_COUNT)
return -EINVAL;
+ ipcm->substream = array_index_nospec(ipcm->substream,
+ EMU10K1_FX8010_PCM_COUNT);
pcm = &emu->fx8010.pcm[ipcm->substream];
mutex_lock(&emu->fx8010.lock);
spin_lock_irq(&emu->reg_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists