linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 15/88] ipv4: Fix potential Spectre v1 vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:07:44 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 15/88] ipv4: Fix potential Spectre v1 vulnerability

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>

[ Upstream commit 5648451e30a0d13d11796574919a359025d52cce ]

vr.vifi is indirectly controlled by user-space, hence leading to
a potential exploitation of the Spectre variant 1 vulnerability.

This issue was detected with the help of Smatch:

net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1616 ipmr_ioctl() warn: potential spectre issue 'mrt->vif_table' [r] (local cap)
net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1690 ipmr_compat_ioctl() warn: potential spectre issue 'mrt->vif_table' [r] (local cap)

Fix this by sanitizing vr.vifi before using it to index mrt->vif_table'

Notice that given that speculation windows are large, the policy is
to kill the speculation on the first load and not worry if it can be
completed with a dependent load/store [1].

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152449131114778&w=2

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/ipmr.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
 #include <net/netlink.h>
 #include <net/fib_rules.h>
 #include <linux/netconf.h>
+#include <linux/nospec.h>
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_IP_PIMSM_V1) || defined(CONFIG_IP_PIMSM_V2)
 #define CONFIG_IP_PIMSM	1
@@ -1574,6 +1575,7 @@ int ipmr_compat_ioctl(struct sock *sk, u
 			return -EFAULT;
 		if (vr.vifi >= mrt->maxvif)
 			return -EINVAL;
+		vr.vifi = array_index_nospec(vr.vifi, mrt->maxvif);
 		read_lock(&mrt_lock);
 		vif = &mrt->vif_table[vr.vifi];
 		if (VIF_EXISTS(mrt, vr.vifi)) {