linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.20 39/65] xprtrdma: Yet another double DMA-unmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190111131101.964250236@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:15:25 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 39/65] xprtrdma: Yet another double DMA-unmap

4.20-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>

commit e2f34e26710bfaa545a9d9cd0c70137406401467 upstream.

While chasing yet another set of DMAR fault reports, I noticed that
the frwr recycler conflates whether or not an MR has been DMA
unmapped with frwr->fr_state. Actually the two have only an indirect
relationship. It's in fact impossible to guess reliably whether the
MR has been DMA unmapped based on its fr_state field, especially as
the surrounding code and its assumptions have changed over time.

A better approach is to track the DMA mapping status explicitly so
that the recycler is less brittle to unexpected situations, and
attempts to DMA-unmap a second time are prevented.

Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.20
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c |    6 ++++--
 net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c    |    9 ++++++---
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c
@@ -117,15 +117,15 @@ static void
 frwr_mr_recycle_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct rpcrdma_mr *mr = container_of(work, struct rpcrdma_mr, mr_recycle);
-	enum rpcrdma_frwr_state state = mr->frwr.fr_state;
 	struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = mr->mr_xprt;
 
 	trace_xprtrdma_mr_recycle(mr);
 
-	if (state != FRWR_FLUSHED_LI) {
+	if (mr->mr_dir != DMA_NONE) {
 		trace_xprtrdma_mr_unmap(mr);
 		ib_dma_unmap_sg(r_xprt->rx_ia.ri_device,
 				mr->mr_sg, mr->mr_nents, mr->mr_dir);
+		mr->mr_dir = DMA_NONE;
 	}
 
 	spin_lock(&r_xprt->rx_buf.rb_mrlock);
@@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ frwr_op_init_mr(struct rpcrdma_ia *ia, s
 	if (!mr->mr_sg)
 		goto out_list_err;
 
+	frwr->fr_state = FRWR_IS_INVALID;
+	mr->mr_dir = DMA_NONE;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mr->mr_list);
 	INIT_WORK(&mr->mr_recycle, frwr_mr_recycle_worker);
 	sg_init_table(mr->mr_sg, depth);
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
@@ -1329,9 +1329,12 @@ rpcrdma_mr_unmap_and_put(struct rpcrdma_
 {
 	struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = mr->mr_xprt;
 
-	trace_xprtrdma_mr_unmap(mr);
-	ib_dma_unmap_sg(r_xprt->rx_ia.ri_device,
-			mr->mr_sg, mr->mr_nents, mr->mr_dir);
+	if (mr->mr_dir != DMA_NONE) {
+		trace_xprtrdma_mr_unmap(mr);
+		ib_dma_unmap_sg(r_xprt->rx_ia.ri_device,
+				mr->mr_sg, mr->mr_nents, mr->mr_dir);
+		mr->mr_dir = DMA_NONE;
+	}
 	__rpcrdma_mr_put(&r_xprt->rx_buf, mr);
 }