linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 142/148] of: of_node_get()/of_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190111131119.989945022@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:15:20 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 142/148] of: of_node_get()/of_node_put() nodes held in phandle cache

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>

commit b8a9ac1a5b99a2fcbed19fd29d2d59270c281a31 upstream.

The phandle cache contains struct device_node pointers.  The refcount
of the pointers was not incremented while in the cache, allowing use
after free error after kfree() of the node.  Add the proper increment
and decrement of the use count.

Fixes: 0b3ce78e90fc ("of: cache phandle nodes to reduce cost of of_find_node_by_phandle()")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.17+
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/of/base.c |   70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -115,9 +115,6 @@ int __weak of_node_to_nid(struct device_
 }
 #endif
 
-static struct device_node **phandle_cache;
-static u32 phandle_cache_mask;
-
 /*
  * Assumptions behind phandle_cache implementation:
  *   - phandle property values are in a contiguous range of 1..n
@@ -126,6 +123,44 @@ static u32 phandle_cache_mask;
  *   - the phandle lookup overhead reduction provided by the cache
  *     will likely be less
  */
+
+static struct device_node **phandle_cache;
+static u32 phandle_cache_mask;
+
+/*
+ * Caller must hold devtree_lock.
+ */
+static void __of_free_phandle_cache(void)
+{
+	u32 cache_entries = phandle_cache_mask + 1;
+	u32 k;
+
+	if (!phandle_cache)
+		return;
+
+	for (k = 0; k < cache_entries; k++)
+		of_node_put(phandle_cache[k]);
+
+	kfree(phandle_cache);
+	phandle_cache = NULL;
+}
+
+int of_free_phandle_cache(void)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags);
+
+	__of_free_phandle_cache();
+
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#if !defined(CONFIG_MODULES)
+late_initcall_sync(of_free_phandle_cache);
+#endif
+
 void of_populate_phandle_cache(void)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -135,8 +170,7 @@ void of_populate_phandle_cache(void)
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags);
 
-	kfree(phandle_cache);
-	phandle_cache = NULL;
+	__of_free_phandle_cache();
 
 	for_each_of_allnodes(np)
 		if (np->phandle && np->phandle != OF_PHANDLE_ILLEGAL)
@@ -154,30 +188,15 @@ void of_populate_phandle_cache(void)
 		goto out;
 
 	for_each_of_allnodes(np)
-		if (np->phandle && np->phandle != OF_PHANDLE_ILLEGAL)
+		if (np->phandle && np->phandle != OF_PHANDLE_ILLEGAL) {
+			of_node_get(np);
 			phandle_cache[np->phandle & phandle_cache_mask] = np;
+		}
 
 out:
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
 }
 
-int of_free_phandle_cache(void)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags);
-
-	kfree(phandle_cache);
-	phandle_cache = NULL;
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-#if !defined(CONFIG_MODULES)
-late_initcall_sync(of_free_phandle_cache);
-#endif
-
 void __init of_core_init(void)
 {
 	struct device_node *np;
@@ -1155,8 +1174,11 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phan
 	if (!np) {
 		for_each_of_allnodes(np)
 			if (np->phandle == handle) {
-				if (phandle_cache)
+				if (phandle_cache) {
+					/* will put when removed from cache */
+					of_node_get(np);
 					phandle_cache[masked_handle] = np;
+				}
 				break;
 			}
 	}