[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a65a014-9013-cfbd-48a9-67199d33e719@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 14:24:24 +0530
From: "Kohli, Gaurav" <gkohli@...eaurora.org>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at kernel/sched/core.c:3490!
HI Peter, Oleg,
as per flag and state this seems to be possible only from below code:
XXX: 0 1 0x40844c
PF_NOFREEZE
PF_RANDOMIZE
PF_SIGNALED
PF_FORKNOEXEC
PF_EXITING
PF_EXITPIDONE
above state shows do_exit runs properely and if somehow after parked
stated , TASK_WAKEKILL got set and signal_pending_state returns 1 in
below case:
switch_count = &prev->nivcsw;
if (!preempt && prev->state) {
if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev))) {
prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
} else {
deactivate_task(rq, prev, DEQUEUE_SLEEP |
DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
Regards
Gaurav
On 1/11/2019 9:47 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 16:07 +0530, Kohli, Gaurav wrote:
>>
>> On 1/7/2019 11:26 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> pr_crit("XXX: %ld %d\n", current->state, current->on_rq);
>>
>> Can we also add flags, this may help to know the path of problem:
>>
>> pr_crit("XXX: %ld %d 0x%x\n", current->state, current->on_rq,
>> current->flags);
>>
>
> XXX: 0 1 0x40844c
>
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists