linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: fix vhost vsock cid hashing inconsistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:48:42 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     zhabin@...ux.alibaba.com
Cc:     stefanha@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gerry@...ux.alibaba.com, kata-dev@...ts.katacontainers.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: fix vhost vsock cid hashing inconsistent

From: Zha Bin <zhabin@...ux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue,  8 Jan 2019 16:07:03 +0800

> The vsock core only supports 32bit CID, but the Virtio-vsock spec define
> CID (dst_cid and src_cid) as u64 and the upper 32bits is reserved as
> zero. This inconsistency causes one bug in vhost vsock driver. The
> scenarios is:
> 
>   0. A hash table (vhost_vsock_hash) is used to map an CID to a vsock
>   object. And hash_min() is used to compute the hash key. hash_min() is
>   defined as:
>   (sizeof(val) <= 4 ? hash_32(val, bits) : hash_long(val, bits)).
>   That means the hash algorithm has dependency on the size of macro
>   argument 'val'.
>   0. In function vhost_vsock_set_cid(), a 64bit CID is passed to
>   hash_min() to compute the hash key when inserting a vsock object into
>   the hash table.
>   0. In function vhost_vsock_get(), a 32bit CID is passed to hash_min()
>   to compute the hash key when looking up a vsock for an CID.
> 
> Because the different size of the CID, hash_min() returns different hash
> key, thus fails to look up the vsock object for an CID.
> 
> To fix this bug, we keep CID as u64 in the IOCTLs and virtio message
> headers, but explicitly convert u64 to u32 when deal with the hash table
> and vsock core.
> 
> Fixes: 834e772c8db0 ("vhost/vsock: fix use-after-free in network stack callers")
> Link: https://github.com/stefanha/virtio/blob/vsock/trunk/content.tex
> Signed-off-by: Zha Bin <zhabin@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Liu Jiang <gerry@...ux.alibaba.com>

Applied, thank you.