[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2d62e31-a64c-4561-a7ad-1625acad8a3d.longchun.lc@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 11:56:09 +0800
From: "隆春" <longchun.lc@...baba-inc.com>
To: "yamada.masahiro" <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: "李诚(允诚)" <lc85446@...baba-inc.com>,
"李丹(斗铠)" <doukai.ld@...baba-inc.com>,
"许来光(朔飞)" <laiguang.xlg@...baba-inc.com>,
"邬桅桅(无帆)" <tom.www@...baba-inc.com>,
"李耀(败天)" <yao.ly@...baba-inc.com>,
"王佳琦(凌夜)" <jiaqi.wjq@...baba-inc.com>,
"申晨(孤韧)" <shenchen@...baba-inc.com>,
"keescook" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "tglx" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo" <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: stack-protector: fix CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE depend on -fno-stack-protector
commit(2a61f4747eeaa85ce26ca9fbd81421b15facd018)rename CC_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE
config. but unfortunately if the compiler support option -fno-stack-protector,
CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE will not be disabled.
CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE and CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG will be enabled at once,
as the following conditions:
1. gcc support -fno-stack-protector & -fstack-protector-strong
2. enabled CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG & STACKPROTECTOR
3. disabled CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE
Download attachment "0001-stack-protector-fix-CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE-depen.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (1418 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists