[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pnt0ds6e.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:00:25 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christoph Biedl <linux-kernel.bfrz@...chmal.in-ulm.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.20 41/65] Revert "powerpc/tm: Unset MSR[TS] if not recheckpointing"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 10:35:59PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote...
>>
>> > 4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>> >
>> > ------------------
>> >
>> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> >
>> > This reverts commit d412deb85a4aada382352a8202beb7af8921cd53 which is
>> > commit 6f5b9f018f4c7686fd944d920209d1382d320e4e upstream.
>> >
>> > It breaks the powerpc build, so drop it from the tree until a fix goes
>> > upstream.
>>
>> Is this necessary on 4.20? The build failures I reported were on 4.19
>> only. The 4.20.2-rc1 kernel for my Powermac G5 builds with and without
>> that patch, both boot fine, no visible differences. Again however, Breno
>> is authoritative here.
>
> If there's no difference on 4.20, then maybe it's not needed there? :)
>
> And yes, I would like confirmation from Breno as well.
You shouldn't need the revert on 4.20.
In 4.20 we changed how MSR_TM_ACTIVE() is defined, which means commit
6f5b9f018f4c ("powerpc/tm: Unset MSR[TS] if not recheckpointing") should
build fine on 4.20.
For 4.19 and earlier MSR_TM_ACTIVE() is different and that's what's
causing the build error.
I have a fix queued in my fixes tree and will push it to Linus in the
next few days.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists