linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cisco tree with the vfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190115093330.1cbb0625@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:33:30 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cisco tree with the vfs tree

Hi Daniel,

On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 16:29:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the cisco tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   dcf8001d292b ("vfs: Suppress MS_* flag defs within the kernel unless explicitly enabled")
> 
> from the vfs tree and commit:
> 
>   2c070709ea75 ("This updates the x86 code to use the CONFIG_GENERIC_CMDLINE")
> 
> from the cisco tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index e493202bf265,ee109f490b22..000000000000
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@@ -51,7 -51,7 +51,8 @@@
>   #include <linux/kvm_para.h>
>   #include <linux/dma-contiguous.h>
>   #include <xen/xen.h>
>  +#include <uapi/linux/mount.h>
> + #include <linux/cmdline.h>
>   
>   #include <linux/errno.h>
>   #include <linux/kernel.h>

This is now a conflict between the cicso tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped