[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5870cf42-415f-f24e-2e29-13affea6fc3a@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 08:20:13 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: yes@....com, robh@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: not call tty close in fallback
On 14. 01. 19, 7:56, yes@....com wrote:
> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
>
> when fail to open tty, tty is not in open status and not need
> to call close
But tty drivers are special and expect close even on failed open, right?
See tty_open.
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
> index fa1672993b4c..bcc1e27d00de 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int ttyport_open(struct serdev_controller *ctrl)
>
> ret = tty->ops->open(serport->tty, NULL);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_close;
> + goto err_unlock;
>
> tty_unlock(serport->tty);
>
> @@ -142,8 +142,6 @@ static int ttyport_open(struct serdev_controller *ctrl)
>
> return 0;
>
> -err_close:
> - tty->ops->close(tty, NULL);
> err_unlock:
> tty_unlock(tty);
> tty_release_struct(tty, serport->tty_idx);
>
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists