[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87won7mzcn.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 10:12:56 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
Cc: Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: don't remove the request if bus-expired
Hi,
Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com> writes:
> We have already returned EAGAIN for bus-expiry, and it's designed to
> start with a future Frame number and start the transfer again. So we
> should not remove the request for that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
Do we need a Fixes tag here? How about Cc stable? Can you share
tracepoints exposing the problem?
thanks
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists