[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYFCid1Hr1auSezwo83Djm9C82L7WF4LzfW1a8gKLLsaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:45:46 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] qcom: spmi: add support for hierarchical IRQ chip
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:43 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> Regarding the device trees, I think we usually merge device tree
> changes in parallel (orthogonally) and as long as the end result
> after merging both driver code and device tree changes is correct
> we do not bother *too* much about any intermittent states.
>
> That said I can of course merge the DTS changes in the pin control
> tree if I get some ACK from the Qualcomm maintainers.
>
> Else I will just apply patches 1-7 to the pin control tree ASAP and
> the DTS changes need to go through qcom (Andy's tree) and
> ARM SoC.
PS that would mean dropping patches 6 and 14 obviously.
If I merge all patches, I can keep them around.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists