linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] qcom: spmi: add support for hierarchical IRQ chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:45:46 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org>,
        Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] qcom: spmi: add support for hierarchical IRQ chip

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:43 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:

> Regarding the device trees, I think we usually merge device tree
> changes in parallel (orthogonally) and as long as the end result
> after merging both driver code and device tree changes is correct
> we do not bother *too* much about any intermittent states.
>
> That said I can of course merge the DTS changes in the pin control
> tree if I get some ACK from the Qualcomm maintainers.
>
> Else I will just apply patches 1-7 to the pin control tree ASAP and
> the DTS changes need to go through qcom (Andy's tree) and
> ARM SoC.

PS that would mean dropping patches 6 and 14 obviously.
If I merge all patches, I can keep them around.

Yours,
Linus Walleij