linux-kernel - Re: remove block layer bounce buffering for MMC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFqCOWmd3kE=f3bgOgYX-aQKCmbuRH98sTr05sHN71vXZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:26:11 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
        Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
        Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        "list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
        Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: remove block layer bounce buffering for MMC

+Linus Walleij (recently made a cleanup of the mmc bounce buffering code).

On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 10:58, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> this series converts the remaining MMC host drivers to properly kmap the
> scatterlist entries it does PIO operations on, and then goes on to
> remove the usage of block layer bounce buffering (which I plan to remove
> eventually) from the MMC layer.
>
> As a bonus I've converted various drivers to the proper scatterlist
> helpers so that at least in theory they are ready for chained
> scatterlists.
>
> All the changes are compile tested only as I don't have any of the
> hardware, so a careful review would be appreciated.

Thanks for posting this. I will have a look as soon as I can, but
first needs to catch up with things since the holidays.

Kind regards
Uffe