[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190114103139.GA31005@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:31:39 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] videobuf2: replace a layering violation with
dma_map_resource
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 05:54:16PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:17:31 +0100
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> escreveu:
>
> > vb2_dc_get_userptr pokes into arm direct mapping details to get the
> > resemblance of a dma address for a a physical address that does is
> > not backed by a page struct. Not only is this not portable to other
> > architectures with dma direct mapping offsets, but also not to uses
> > of IOMMUs of any kind. Switch to the proper dma_map_resource /
> > dma_unmap_resource interface instead.
>
> Makes sense to me. I'm assuming that you'll be pushing it together
> with other mm patches, so:
Not really mm, but rather DMA mapping, but yes, I'd love to take it
all together.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists