[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fcee383c-f2cb-1faf-d2a3-a35a17d57b8b@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:52:00 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/17] ARM: davinci: da850: WARN() if clk_get() fails
On 11/01/19 10:51 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> Currently the timer code checks if the clock pointer passed to it is
> good (!IS_ERR(clk)). The new clocksource driver expects the clock to
> be functional and doesn't perform any checks so emit a warning if
> clk_get() fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
I think 4-9 can be a single patch. They are doing something very similar
and its unlikely we will have to patch/revert just one of them.
Thanks,
Sekhar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists