[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190114130153.GC21544@amd>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 14:01:54 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman9394@...il.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/speculation: Add document to describe Spectre and
its mitigations
On Mon 2019-01-14 13:06:24, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > > That one really is Intel-specific (not even all x86s are affectd). Same
> > > > for Meltdown.
> > >
> > > At least for Meltdown, your claim is simply not correct.
> >
> > You are right, there may be few ARM chips affected by meltdown.
>
> And some of the powerpc64s as well.
Do you mean this?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/8/649
Frankly I'd not call it Meltdown, as it works only on data in the
cache, so the defense is completely different. Seems more like a l1tf
:-).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists