linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9] mm/page_alloc.c: memory_hotplug: free pages as higher order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190114143251.GI21345@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:32:51 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Arun KS <arunks@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
        arunks.linux@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
        osalvador@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, getarunks@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] mm/page_alloc.c: memory_hotplug: free pages as higher
 order

On Mon 14-01-19 19:29:39, Arun KS wrote:
> On 2019-01-10 21:53, Alexander Duyck wrote:
[...]
> > Couldn't you just do something like the following:
> > 		if ((end - start) >= (1UL << (MAX_ORDER - 1))
> > 			order = MAX_ORDER - 1;
> > 		else
> > 			order = __fls(end - start);
> > 
> > I would think this would save you a few steps in terms of conversions
> > and such since you are already working in page frame numbers anyway so
> > a block of 8 pfns would represent an order 3 page wouldn't it?
> > 
> > Also it seems like an alternative to using "end" would be to just track
> > nr_pages. Then you wouldn't have to do the "end - start" math in a few
> > spots as long as you remembered to decrement nr_pages by the amount you
> > increment start by.
> 
> Thanks for that. How about this?
> 
> static int online_pages_blocks(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
>         unsigned long end = start + nr_pages;
>         int order;
> 
>         while (nr_pages) {
>                 if (nr_pages >= (1UL << (MAX_ORDER - 1)))
>                         order = MAX_ORDER - 1;
>                 else
>                         order = __fls(nr_pages);
> 
>                 (*online_page_callback)(pfn_to_page(start), order);
>                 nr_pages -= (1UL << order);
>                 start += (1UL << order);
>         }
>         return end - start;
> }

I find this much less readable so if this is really a big win
performance wise then make it a separate patch with some nubbers please.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs