[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k1j8dq1b.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:46:40 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] powerpc/32: add stack protector support
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> On 09/27/18 02:05, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> [..snip..]
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
>> index 07d9dce7eda6..45b8eb4d8fe7 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
>> @@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ KBUILD_LDFLAGS += -m elf$(BITS)$(LDEMULATION)
>> KBUILD_ARFLAGS += --target=elf$(BITS)-$(GNUTARGET)
>> endif
>>
>> +cflags-$(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) += -mstack-protector-guard=tls
>> +cflags-$(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) += -mstack-protector-guard-reg=r2
>> +
>> LDFLAGS_vmlinux-y := -Bstatic
>> LDFLAGS_vmlinux-$(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE) := -pie
>> LDFLAGS_vmlinux := $(LDFLAGS_vmlinux-y)
>> @@ -404,6 +407,13 @@ archclean:
>>
>> archprepare: checkbin
>>
>> +ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
>> +prepare: stack_protector_prepare
>> +
>> +stack_protector_prepare: prepare0
>> + $(eval KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mstack-protector-guard-offset=$(shell awk '{if ($$2 == "TASK_CANARY") print $$3;}' include/generated/asm-offsets.h))
>> +endif
>> +
>
> This breaks when building out-of-tree kernel modules. GCC is not getting passed
> the -mstack-protector-guard-offset argument, so the default offset is used. The
> kernel then panics the first time a function with stack protector is called.
>
> I'm seeing this on powerpc64. It looks like it was reported for powerpc on
> kernel bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201891
Thanks for the bug report.
Alexey also hit this and sent an RFC fix.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1022751/
But Masahiro thought we could do something less hacky, and hopefully he
can help us come up with something better.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists