[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190114170932.awhuv7livfxhrcee@treble>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:09:32 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Subject: Re: ppc64le reliable stack unwinder and scheduled tasks
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 11:46:59AM -0500, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> @@ -158,11 +158,21 @@ save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(struct task_struct *tsk,
> return 1; /* invalid backlink, too far up. */
> }
>
> + /* We can only trust the bottom frame's backlink, the rest
> + * of the frame may be uninitialized, continue to the next. */
> + if (firstframe--)
> + goto next;
Won't this decrement firstframe on every iteration, so when firstframe
is 0, it will decrement it to -1, causing it to 'goto next' on all
future iterations?
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists