[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190114180142.GO2773@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 19:01:42 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Kazuhito Hagio <k-hagio@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"bhe@...hat.com" <bhe@...hat.com>,
"dyoung@...hat.com" <dyoung@...hat.com>,
"anderson@...hat.com" <anderson@...hat.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v6] kdump: add the vmcoreinfo documentation
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 05:48:48PM +0000, Kazuhito Hagio wrote:
> As for makedumpfile, it will be not impossible to remove the
> init_uts_ns.name.relase (OSRELEASE), but some fixes are needed.
> Because historically OSRELEASE has been a kind of a mandatory entry
> in vmcoreinfo from the beginning of vmcoreinfo, so makedumpfile uses
> its existence to check whether a vmcoreinfo is sane.
Well, init_uts_ns is exported in vmcoreinfo anyway - makedumpfile
can simply test init_uts_ns.name.release just as well. And the
"historically" argument doesn't matter because vmcoreinfo is not an ABI.
So makedumpfile needs to be changed to check that new export.
> Also, I think crash also will need to be fixed if it is removed.
Yes, I'm expecting user tools to be fixed and then exports removed.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists