[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190114203500.GU2773@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 21:35:00 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Anderson <anderson@...hat.com>
Cc: Kazuhito Hagio <k-hagio@...jp.nec.com>,
Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhe@...hat.com, dyoung@...hat.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v6] kdump: add the vmcoreinfo documentation
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 03:26:32PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> No. It needs *both* the vmlinux file and the vmcore file in order to read kernel
> virtual memory, so just having a kernel virtual address is insufficient.
>
> So it's a chicken-and-egg situation. This particular --osrelease option is used
> to determine *what* vmlinux file would be required for an actual crash analysis
> session.
Ok, that makes sense. I could've used that explanation when reviewing
the documentation. Do you mind skimming through this:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190111145650.GG4729@zn.tnic
in case we've missed explaining relevant usage - like that above - of
some of the vmcoreinfo members?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists