[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d50e3ea1-9be0-88fb-ce86-53b3c9873ca0@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:08:05 +0530
From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To: Christian Hohnstaedt <Christian.Hohnstaedt@...o.com>
CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mfd: tps65218.c: Add input voltage options
On Thursday 03 January 2019 07:17 PM, Christian Hohnstaedt wrote:
> These options apply to all regulators in this chip.
>
> ti,strict-supply-voltage-supervision:
> Set STRICT flag in CONFIG1
> ti,under-voltage-limit-microvolt:
> Select 2.75, 2.95, 3.25 or 3.35 V UVLO in CONFIG1
> ti,under-voltage-hyst-microvolt:
> Select 200mV or 400mV UVLOHYS in CONFIG2
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#146: FILE: drivers/mfd/tps65218.c:219:
+ if (of_property_read_u32(tps->dev->of_node,
+ "ti,strict-supply-voltage-supervision", &strict))
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#156: FILE: drivers/mfd/tps65218.c:229:
+ tps65218_update_bits(tps, TPS65218_REG_CONFIG1,
+ TPS65218_CONFIG1_STRICT,
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#166: FILE: drivers/mfd/tps65218.c:239:
+ if (of_property_read_u32(tps->dev->of_node,
+ "ti,under-voltage-hyst-microvolt", &hyst))
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#176: FILE: drivers/mfd/tps65218.c:249:
+ tps65218_update_bits(tps, TPS65218_REG_CONFIG2,
+ TPS65218_CONFIG2_UVLOHYS,
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#188: FILE: drivers/mfd/tps65218.c:261:
+ if (of_property_read_u32(tps->dev->of_node,
+ "ti,under-voltage-limit-microvolt", &uvlo))
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#211: FILE: drivers/mfd/tps65218.c:284:
+ tps65218_update_bits(tps, TPS65218_REG_CONFIG1,
+ TPS65218_CONFIG1_UVLO_MASK, uvloval,
Some checkpatch warnings to be fixed.
Other than that i tested your patch on am437x-gp-evm for boot and suspend/resume.
After fixing them you can add my:
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Reviewed-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Hohnstaedt <Christian.Hohnstaedt@...o.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/tps65218.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h | 4 ++
> 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65218.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65218.c
> index 8bcdecf..b5e0f3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65218.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65218.c
> @@ -211,6 +211,81 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_tps65218_match_table[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_tps65218_match_table);
>
> +static int tps65218_voltage_set_strict(struct tps65218 *tps)
> +{
> + u32 strict;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(tps->dev->of_node,
> + "ti,strict-supply-voltage-supervision", &strict))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (strict != 0 && strict != 1) {
> + dev_err(tps->dev,
> + "Invalid ti,strict-supply-voltage-supervision value\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + tps65218_update_bits(tps, TPS65218_REG_CONFIG1,
> + TPS65218_CONFIG1_STRICT,
> + strict ? TPS65218_CONFIG1_STRICT : 0, TPS65218_PROTECT_L1);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tps65218_voltage_set_uv_hyst(struct tps65218 *tps)
> +{
> + u32 hyst;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(tps->dev->of_node,
> + "ti,under-voltage-hyst-microvolt", &hyst))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (hyst != 400000 && hyst != 200000) {
> + dev_err(tps->dev,
> + "Invalid ti,under-voltage-hyst-microvolt value\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + tps65218_update_bits(tps, TPS65218_REG_CONFIG2,
> + TPS65218_CONFIG2_UVLOHYS,
> + hyst == 400000 ? TPS65218_CONFIG2_UVLOHYS : 0,
> + TPS65218_PROTECT_L1);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tps65218_voltage_set_uvlo(struct tps65218 *tps)
> +{
> + u32 uvlo;
> + int uvloval;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(tps->dev->of_node,
> + "ti,under-voltage-limit-microvolt", &uvlo))
> + return 0;
> +
> + switch (uvlo) {
> + case 2750000:
> + uvloval = TPS65218_CONFIG1_UVLO_2750000;
> + break;
> + case 2950000:
> + uvloval = TPS65218_CONFIG1_UVLO_2950000;
> + break;
> + case 3250000:
> + uvloval = TPS65218_CONFIG1_UVLO_3250000;
> + break;
> + case 3350000:
> + uvloval = TPS65218_CONFIG1_UVLO_3350000;
> + break;
> + default:
> + dev_err(tps->dev,
> + "Invalid ti,under-voltage-limit-microvolt value\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + tps65218_update_bits(tps, TPS65218_REG_CONFIG1,
> + TPS65218_CONFIG1_UVLO_MASK, uvloval,
> + TPS65218_PROTECT_L1);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int tps65218_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> const struct i2c_device_id *ids)
> {
> @@ -249,6 +324,18 @@ static int tps65218_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> tps->rev = chipid & TPS65218_CHIPID_REV_MASK;
>
> + ret = tps65218_voltage_set_strict(tps);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = tps65218_voltage_set_uvlo(tps);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = tps65218_voltage_set_uv_hyst(tps);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> ret = mfd_add_devices(tps->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, tps65218_cells,
> ARRAY_SIZE(tps65218_cells), NULL, 0,
> regmap_irq_get_domain(tps->irq_data));
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h
> index c204d9a..3cbe103 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h
> @@ -137,6 +137,10 @@
> #define TPS65218_CONFIG1_PGDLY_MASK 0x18
> #define TPS65218_CONFIG1_STRICT BIT(2)
> #define TPS65218_CONFIG1_UVLO_MASK 0x3
> +#define TPS65218_CONFIG1_UVLO_2750000 0x0
> +#define TPS65218_CONFIG1_UVLO_2950000 0x1
> +#define TPS65218_CONFIG1_UVLO_3250000 0x2
> +#define TPS65218_CONFIG1_UVLO_3350000 0x3
>
> #define TPS65218_CONFIG2_DC12_RST BIT(7)
> #define TPS65218_CONFIG2_UVLOHYS BIT(6)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists